Write in your own words. A guardian or teacher should review this response.
Show model answer and explanation
No. Some does not establish all.
Review both the conclusion and its reason. Some does not establish all.
University admission · Other / specialist pathway · Business studies
Business subjects for the chosen programme
Use source evaluation and logical reasoning in a humanities response.
Original Model Test for Exam unit. These questions and suggested practice times are independent Kidemy material, not an official or past paper. Choose modules for the target programme; all listed subjects are not required for every applicant.
Learn the idea
A source has an author, date, purpose and context. A primary source can still be partial or mistaken; primary means direct to the event or evidence, not automatically true. In an argument, distinguish a conclusion, a premise and a missing assumption.
Worked example
A fictional town report says attendance rose after a new bus route. That sequence alone does not prove the route caused the rise: school hours or enrolment may also have changed.
- Identify source and purpose.
- Separate observation from causal claim.
- Ask what alternative evidence would discriminate.
Your written practice
Show your working on paper and enter your answer here. If it does not match, compare the model and try again.
Write in your own words. A guardian or teacher should review this response.
Show model answer and explanation
No. R is within P, which excludes Q.
Review both the conclusion and its reason. R is within P, which excludes Q.
Show model answer and explanation
35
Differences 5,7,9, then 11.
Write in your own words. A guardian or teacher should review this response.
Show model answer and explanation
Comparable attendance records before and after, with information on other changes and an appropriate comparison group.
Explain how evidence addresses alternatives.
Write in your own words. A guardian or teacher should review this response.
Show model answer and explanation
Its definitions, coverage and purpose affect what its figures can show.
Do not equate authority with complete evidence.
Reasoning model test
Critique a fictional policy claim in 150 words.
Review with a guardian or teacher
- State the claim fairly.
- Identify a missing assumption.
- Propose relevant evidence without inventing facts.
Keep your work on paper or in a local file. This page does not upload it or automatically grade the project.
Teacher-led lessons, schedules and prices for this outline are upcoming. You can use any starter practice above now without booking.
Your next step
Solo practice works without an account. Sign in to save a practice record to your learner profile.
Keep practising
Exact lesson links and related activities are labelled separately. Return-to-course links retain your selected learning path.